Wayo is On-Demand Intracity logistics platform that allows users {can be businesses (SME's/retail stores) or individuals} to transport anything (from a document to a king-size bed - wide range of vehicles from 2W to 8ft) from point A to point B (within the same city as of now) in a safe (our drivers are verified - background check is done) and cheap manner
Users can also use the application for the following use cases:
Wayo allows it's users to avail services in all the use cases, as mentioned above
User Type | Natural Frequency | % contribution (MAU) |
---|---|---|
Casual Users | 1-2 orders/month | ~75% |
Core Users | 3-4 orders/month | ~21% |
Power Users | >=5 orders/month | ~4% |
We has certain use cases, which we can categorize as sub-products. These are:
Sub Product | Details | Natural Frequency | % contribution (Monthly completed orders) |
---|---|---|---|
Scheduled deliveries | Types of orders where the user can schedule a delivery from the start | 20 orders/day | ~5% |
Multi-stop deliveries | Types of orders which require multiple drops within a specific route | 10 orders/day | ~2.5% |
Framework Type | Priority | Covered in the project? | Key metrics to be tracked |
---|---|---|---|
New Feature - POD | High | No |
|
Depth | Low | No | |
Frequency | Very High | Yes |
|
The idea behind this would be to improve the Wallet Share of the customers. Since we are targeting to acquire SMEs - ICP 1 - (mix of SMEs being 80%); these are customers with relatively high potential orders (5-6 orders) in a month, but currently they are transacting with us just for 1-2 times a month (~75% of MAU falling in this category)
There is a use case for which ICP 1 prefers the local Naka stand to any of the competition. The major use case is POD i.e. Proof Of Delivery. POD is a physical receipt that the sender of the goods needs to keep it in his repository.
To put some numbers:
Any user who has placed an successful completed order is termed as an active user
Some starting points for user segmentation are:
For New Users
For Old Users
User Type | Casual | Core | Power |
Usage Characteristics | General Use cases: | General Use cases: | General Use cases: |
Natural Frequency (on Wayo) | 1-2 times/month | 3-4 times/month | >5 times/month |
Business Potential | 5-6 times/month | 8-10 times/month | 12-15 times/month |
Monthly Revenue Generated (On Wayo) | Rs. 500-700/month | Rs. 2800/month | Rs. 4000/month |
Monthly business potential | Rs. 15000-18000/month | Rs. 35000 - 40000/month | Rs. 75000/month |
Pain Points | ββ- Variable and high pricing, which creates issues in his costing estimation | ββ- Variable and high pricing, which creates issues in his costing estimation | ββ- Variable and high pricing, which creates issues in his costing estimation |
Valued Features | β- Vehicle availability | β- Vehicle availability | β- Vehicle availability |
Core Value Proposition (CVP) being utilized | β- Point to point deliveries | β- Point to point deliveries | β- Point to point deliveries |
JTBD of the persona |
|
|
|
How did they get to know about the competition? | β- Online | β- Online | β- Online |
How did they get to know about Wayo? | β- WoM | β- WoM | β- Online |
Criteria | ICP 1 | ICP 2 | ICP 3 |
Name | Mr. Ankit Dwivedi | Mrs. Shalini Choudhary | Mr. Devansh Agrawal |
Age | 40 years | β25 years | 28 years |
Demographics | Gender: Male; Level of education: Graduation; Employment: Self employed; Marital Status: Married | Gender: Female; Level of education: Post-Graduation; Employment: Self employed; Marital Status: Unmarried | Gender: Male; Level of education: Post-Graduation; Employment: Working in an MNC; Marital Status: Unmarried |
Need | Transport goods from one point to another in the following way: | Transport goods from one point to another in the following way: | Transport goods from one point to another in the following way: |
Company Size |
|
| NA |
Industry Domain and nature of business |
|
| NA |
Pain Point | * Variable and high pricing, which creates issues in his costing estimation | * Lack of trusted delivery platforms - had a bad experience with Porter as the final product needs to reach the final customer in a specified manner | * Wants to shift his household goods from one point to another - but not able to find trustworthy vendors |
Solution | For Point-to-point deliveries, he uses On-Demand platforms like Porter For customizable deliveries, he still uses the Naka | For Point-to-point deliveries, she uses On-Demand platforms like Porter Uses cab services (Ola/Uber) to send her stock sometimes | Uses Porter for smaller loads within the city For larger goods/intercity movement, uses packers and movers services like APML |
Decision Maker |
|
|
|
Marketing Pitch | Transport your goods anywhere in Delhi NCR in the cheapest, safe and hassle-free manner | Transport your goods anywhere in Delhi NCR in the safest possible manner! | House shifting made easy - Use our services to move your home in a safe and homely manner! |
Frequency of use case |
|
| Rarely requires it - 1-2 deliveries every 6 months |
Average Spend on the product | Rs. 3000-3500/day | βRs. 1000-1200/day | Rs. 2000/year |
Frequently used apps |
|
|
|
How did they get to know about the competition |
|
|
|
Price Sensitivity | Moderate to High | Moderate | Low |
Types of languages they consume |
|
|
|
Question: What product hook needs to be built to move the customer from Casual > Core > Power?
Answer: A loyalty program, tailor made for each segments of users to move each segment to the higher segment
Serial Number | Goal |
---|---|
1 | Increase the Wallet Share of the customers in each bucket |
2 | Incremental shift in the customers from the lower bucket to the higher one |
Serial Number | Metric |
---|---|
1 | Increase in Wallet Share (overall) |
2 | Wallet Share change across Casual, Core and Power Users - MoM |
The success metric (North Star Metric) that we would be tracking is increase in the wallet share of the active customers
We want to increase the Wallet Share of the customers in a given month. As per the user calls, the current WS on the app is way lower than the potential of the customers in each of the segments: Casual; Core; Power
Current Monthly Wallet Share: 2.1
Target Monthly Wallet Share: 2.3
Currently, there is no loyalty program, which helps in progressively move the customers from one segment to another.
We try to circumvent this through the following process:
For this we have created 4 user segments: These are:
The above segments would be dynamically refreshed every 4 weeks (rationale for 4 weeks is the demand cycle of a user in logistics)
The initial plans that would be offered are as follows:
Plan | Target Segment | Plan Construct |
---|---|---|
P1 | Casual |
|
P2 | Core |
|
P3 | Power |
|
User flow would be as follows:
This section will cover where all the proposed plans would be shown in the order lifecycle journey.
The justifications and how will it be adopted is mentioned in the following screenshots:
Serial Number | Metric |
---|---|
1 | Total Completed Orders/Total active customers (>=1 order) |
2 | WS change across the following customer segments: |
3 | Number of absolute change in customers active across the three segments - Casual; Core; Power |
4 | % contribution of Casual; Core; Power to the active customers |
5 | Number of customers subscribing to P1 Plan |
6 | Revenue generated from P1 Plan |
7 | Number of customers subscribing to P2 Plan |
8 | Revenue generated from P2 Plan |
9 | Number of customers subscribing to P3 Plan |
10 | Revenue generated from P3 Plan |
A detailed view of the campaigns for the loyalty program here
The campaigns and trigger points where the communication can happen are as follows:
Trigger point | Details | End Goal? |
---|---|---|
Home screen drop off | Users who didn't take any action and dropped off from the home screen |
|
Pickup screen drop off | Users putting/selecting the pickup location and then dropping off |
|
Drop screen drop off | Users putting/selecting the drop location and then dropping off |
|
Price Review Screen drop off | The screen where the pricing of each of the vehicle categories is visible |
|
Driver allocation screen drop off | The screen where the vehicle searching takes place |
|
A detailed view of the retention campaigns can be found here
The current retention rate for customers is as follows:
Note: This is the median retention curves for the all the previous months
No clear flattening of the retention curve can be seen in the above users, hence more months data would be required to look at this. Flattening might happen later
Even though this is the median data, the more recent trends can't be visible from this data to draw some actionable insights. Hence, it would be beneficial to look at the MoM retention for different types of users.
Observations and Insights
Steps Taken: We have rejigged the incentive structure, with the sales executive focusing on acquisition and his team leader focusing on getting repeat orders from his customers
Steps Taken: We have set up KAMs to be in touch with the Power users and ensure that their orders don't drop. Apart from that, we have set up prepared a robust handholding journey, with repeated communications pushing our CVP
Steps Taken: Our driver acquisition and behavior has improved significantly, leading to better fulfilment
Steps Taken: We have launched all vehicle categories, catering to all the use cases of the users
Steps Taken: We are serviceable across the city, thereby giving the option to book from anywhere, anytime
Typically, ICP 1 drives the best retention, closely followed by ICP 2
Among the ICP 1, as seen from the above data, Power users drive the best retention
Churned User definition: Any user who has not placed a gross order (this means tried placing an order but it not get completed due to any reason) for the last 30 days since his last completed order.
This definition is common across all the segments - Casual; Core; Power
Top Reasons | Details | Contribution to overall churn |
---|---|---|
Vehicle Availability | He couldn't find a vehicle, even after placing multiple orders | Very High |
Vehicle Assortment | He required 8ft category, but that wasn't launched as yet | Very High |
Serviceable Region | We weren't serviceable across the city at that point in time, leading to churn | Very High |
Multiple use cases | He requires our platform for multiple use cases: | High |
Driver Behavior | Various sub headings under this: | High |
Pricing | Found a better price on competition (Naka/Porter) | Low |
Top Reasons | Details | Contribution to overall churn |
---|---|---|
Change of manufacturing unit | He has changed his manufacturing unit to the outskirts of the city, where we are not serviceable yet | Very Low |
Two things to primarily look out for in this:
Start raising alarms if this is happening for two consecutive weeks
If we see a decrease in the number of sessions in each of the user buckets. This is a leading indicator
The major reasons for churn, as discussed in the previous section were:
I have tried to create campaigns around these major pain points
Please find the resurrection campaigns here
Brand focused courses
Great brands aren't built on clicks. They're built on trust. Craft narratives that resonate, campaigns that stand out, and brands that last.
All courses
Master every lever of growth β from acquisition to retention, data to events. Pick a course, go deep, and apply it to your business right away.
Explore foundations by GrowthX
Built by Leaders From Amazon, CRED, Zepto, Hindustan Unilever, Flipkart, paytm & more
Crack a new job or a promotion with the Career Centre
Designed for mid-senior & leadership roles across growth, product, marketing, strategy & business
Learning Resources
Browse 500+ case studies, articles & resources the learning resources that you won't find on the internet.
Patienceβyouβre about to be impressed.